Where We Stand
The B.S. Report is primarily a place for us to comment, or even to vent. It is only partially a “political” site though our views will certainly not be hidden. In fact, we have no problem making our views transparent for all to see.
We are definitely not Democrats; nor are we Republicans as they exist today. To put it in a “nutshell,” as they say, we believe in the America of the Founders, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution.
The United States is a nation of laws. We are not a Democracy–at least that’s not what our Founders intended. Our law is not based on majority rule. We are a Representative Republic and our rulebook is the Constitution.
We believe that the Constitution was written in plain English; therefore, in most instances, we know its meaning precisely and it doesn’t need to be interpreted. We do not believe in a “living” Constitution. For the Constitution to mean anything at all, its values must be “fixed.” To have a “living” Constitution is akin to having no Constitution at all. Transforming the Constitution should be difficult–the Founders provided for any necessary changes through the deliberately more cumbersome amendment process.
We believe in the power of the private citizen, unfettered by government intrusion. We believe in the concept of “Natural Law” and the sanctity of private property–we believe in the quaint notion that “a man’s home is his castle.” We believe in “rugged individualism” and the “pioneer spirit” that not only built this country, but also allowed it to thrive and develop into the greatest nation in the history of the civilized world.
We believe it is our mission to help restore the belief in individual freedom, coupled by the inherent responsibilities that come with that freedom. We believe that there is an organized effort to destroy the principles this country was founded upon. We vow to fight against that effort.
We are against all things Socialism–we are committed to keeping as much power out of government control and within the purview of the private citizen. We believe that the concept of a limited government has been lost, perhaps forever. Nonetheless, it makes no sense to surrender, so we continue the fight in the hope that there are better days ahead.
We believe in the axiom “that the government that governs least, governs best.” Therefore, we are firm believers in the concept of Federalism and the “separation of powers.” Our view is that government is better, more efficient and more responsive, the more local it remains. For that reason, we believe that power that has been commandeered by the Federal government should be reclaimed by the separate states. We will actively support such an effort.
We believe in a free-market, open economy with limited regulation. We believe in the laissez-faire policies of the mid-nineteenth century. We believe that in almost any situation, private solutions are superior to governmental remedies.
We believe in a unique American culture that must be transmitted from one generation to the next, for it is vital to the survival of our nation. We believe this transmission is not being done; even worse, we believe that our educational system, up to and including our elite universities, is actively leading an organized rebellion against our founding ideals. These forces must be confronted and defeated.
We believe in a free and orderly immigration system. We believe in a colorblind society. However, we also believe that it is the immigrant who needs to be assimilated, and owes his allegiance to his newly adopted homeland. The immigrant must bend towards the ways of our country; we mustn’t change our ways to accommodate the immigrant. Our society has prospered because of our founding principles–they cannot be sacrificed to make immigrants feel more comfortable.
We believe in tolerance but we also believe in standards. We believe it’s more important to do what’s right, in spite of the fact that you’re likely to hurt some people’s feelings. We believe that people’s feelings get hurt far more easily today than they did in days past.
We believe in peace through strength. Our freedom is not ensured by media talking heads, mealy-mouthed journalists, or big-mouthed bloggers like us.
It is only through military power that we remain free. There will always be those who wish to destroy us and it is only because of our weaponry and superior technological abilities that we keep those who yearn to hurt us from succeeding. It’s that simple. When we lower our guard and forget this basic principle, we place our nation’s survival and our own individual welfare at risk.
Finally, it is those men and women in all branches of our armed services that are the true heroes. They are the ones on the front lines serving as our first line of defense. And they are the individuals responsible for our comfortable lifestyles and for the preservation and continuation of our great way of life. It is to them that we owe our thanks, our allegiance, and our never-ending gratitude.
48 responses so far ↓
EricTheRed_VocalMinority // February 26, 2009 at 7:48 am |
Amen, brotha!
Just wandered upon this site. Informative and witty. Blogrolled you.
http://VocalMinority.typepad.com
The Jewish Republican’s Web Sanctuary
Dick Goldberg // May 11, 2009 at 6:00 pm |
I completely agree with you. We need to arm ourselves and kill off all of those who threaten our way of life, from the gays to obama to the socialists at the post office.
B.S. Report // May 11, 2009 at 7:02 pm |
Wait a second…don’t say you agree with me. I am certainly not for the killing of gays or socialists–but I’m for killing off ideas that, in my opinion, threaten the future of our nation. I have gay friends and acquaintances and I tell them flat out that I don’t support gay marriage or gay adoption (as a first recourse) because I think that it does harm to the social fabric of the country. But please, don’t misunderstand me, I am not questioning a gay person’s individual humanity or their worthiness as a person.
I believe in the Constitution; I’m not an anarchist. I recognize the need for the limited government our Founders and Framers espoused. By today’s standards that makes me a right-winger–but I’m not a radical. Those of us that cling desperately to First Principles appear radical because much of the country has either moved away from those principles or they are ignorant of them. The truth is that they are the radicals; they are the ones that have “radically” departed from the original vision of the United States.
The success of the United States was a product of the Founders ideas–it did not happen by accident. As we depart from those ideas we will become no different than the other Socialist countries of the world. Obviously, nearly half of the country thinks that would be a good thing. To me, it would spell the end of our country as we know it. That, I believe would be a tragedy not just for those of us who live here–but for the entire world that would no longer have that one bastion of freedom to flee to.
cherry blosbabb // August 14, 2009 at 7:13 pm
you obviously dont have gay friends if you tell them straight up that you think their way of life is fucked. the constitution is fucked, stupid old white men made it, not god. god obviously thinks your fucked too. tell me how painful your death is….
Ann Bachman // May 12, 2009 at 11:20 am |
Dick is right, and deep down, you and all other God-fearing Americans agree with him. Go out and buy as many guns as you can before the gay commies in the government try to take that right away from you too. You know its coming, all you can do is pray and prepare. Personally, I’m looking forward to the final confrontation.
Linda // June 16, 2009 at 1:01 pm |
I have been looking for a forum to discuss what I label Modern American Conservative (MAC) values as opposed to the dictionary definition of conservative or the neocons as emulated by many Republican in Congress today. Basically it would be similar views held by our Founders who incorporated those views into the U.S. Constitution.
I would hope that such discussion would not demean or bash any group by virtue of their gender, race, age, nationality, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, but I would hope that issues related to all could be discussed rationally and constructively.
Is this such a place where that could be done?
B.S. Report // June 16, 2009 at 2:27 pm |
Linda,
We welcome all constructive comments on this site. We don’t believe in groups, we believe in individuals. Therefore, we don’t demean or bash groups–we do, however, bash positions. We believe in America’s traditional values–i.e., those values held by the Founders and written in the Declaration, the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and Washington’s Farewell address. There is room for thoughtful disagreement on any issue but it must be reasoned and not just gratuitous ideological hatred like we see on so many other sites.
You will see a lot of Obama bashing on this site–but, for the most part, it is not the man himself, it is his positions. He may be a wonderful guy personally (though I doubt it), but it is our view that he is the most dangerous president this country has ever had. It has nothing to do with his race and everything to do with his ideology. He has a disdain for America’s traditions and he could care less about the Founders’, the Constitution, and the oath he swore to uphold it. There are, on occasion, jokes on this site, but, we don’t like it to cross too far over the line into a mean-spirited personal attack. We may fail that test on occasion–you’ll judge for yourself. We are not cheerleaders for either party on this site. We attack the Democrats far more because they are the ones causing the most harm. But we have no love affair with Republicans.
President Obama’s goal is to change this country in a very fundamental and, in our view, a dangerous way. It is the duty of all Americans to fight back against him, and against all politicians, both Democratic and Republican, that work to undermine our basic freedoms and the values and traditions that made this country successful. We are Conservatives and it is our goal to persuade our fellow citizens to follow that path and coerce our politicians to adhere to the Constitution and limited government. We appreciate your comments and we thank you so much for writing.
Sheryl // July 8, 2009 at 7:39 am |
Ha ha. This is just a Republican website.
B.S. Report // July 8, 2009 at 8:06 am |
Sheryl,
It’s the sad state of today’s Democratic Party that you think that anyone that wishes to adhere (or return) to the principles of the Declaration and the Constitution has to be a Republican. The fact is, we’re not necessarily Republicans, however, we are Conservatives who believe in the founding tenets of this country. I’m only sorry there are so many people like you that don’t. Anyway, thanks for writing.
Robert Perker // July 8, 2009 at 4:07 pm |
If I could rub the genies bottle and make a wish, it would be that all Americans could be brought to see that conservatism is the path to continued greatness. I wish nothing but success for all my fellow Americans. I am against all ideas that would lead to our demise as the glowing beacon of freedom in the world. I am totally baffled by our national media that wants to portray us as a flawed society in need of a total makeover. Where did they get that idea? I am guilty as well as most of my pears, for the state of our universities and even our high schools. Why in the world didn’t we make a fuss over liberal teachings going on for the last 40 years? We knew it was happening. We will now pay the price for our silence. My children couldn’t bother themselves enough to learn about our Presidential candidates so as to make a reasoned selection. I found totally fraudulent information about Sarah Pallin on their websites and when confronted with their promulgations of lies they were offended but not enough to search out the truth. We have all but lost our influence over our children to their professors and educators. I kick myself in the ass for not taking a more aggressive role in their education. I pray that common sense will somehow intrude, on all of their generation, in time to prevent the destruction of this great nation.
MNguy // August 5, 2009 at 5:23 pm |
It’s peers not “pears”
It’s Palin not “Pallin”
just sayin’
David K // July 12, 2009 at 4:40 pm |
I think you are on the right track but there are too many screaming liberals who think that any disagreement with their point of view is stupid and useless. Liberals are anything but…
They claim to be for the common man but nothing could be farther from the truth.!!!
a second point…when referring to this “site” it is not “sight” you mean.
B.S. Report // July 12, 2009 at 9:53 pm |
David K,
Just an idiotic mistake–thanks for the correction, and thanks for writing. Liberals are anything but for the common man…that’s why they want to remove our right to make most of our own decisions and hand that power over to the state.
Thanks for your input.
steve // July 19, 2009 at 5:28 am |
I completely agree with you, thanks for expressing it so well on this site.
One question: do you believe the 17th Amendment is a major reason why the federal government has been able to make such a successful power grab?
B.S. Report // July 19, 2009 at 9:01 am |
Steve,
The 17th Amendment is certainly one of several important blows to federalism. Democracy sometimes doesn’t give power to the people; in this case it takes power from the people and hands it over to the government bureaucracy. The amendment basically strips power from the states who lose their advocacy group (the Senators), because no longer can their Senators be held accountable to do their bidding by the state legislatures that used to appoint them. Steve, I’m absolutely in favor of repealing the 17th Amendment–but that would be just one “fix.” There are so many other “holes in the dike” of liberty that need repair as well. Thanks for writing.
Anonymous // July 21, 2009 at 8:49 am |
In response to the above comment, might I additionally suggest tort and welfare reform, a flat tax, and a limited bureaucracy? Oh… wait… I probably won’t live that long. Still, good to see more agreeable commentary on the internet. Keep it up, folks.
Tom Sawyer // August 10, 2009 at 7:46 am |
I wandered in here accidentally while doing a google image search for a photo of Walter Williams. I totally agree with the opinions expressed in this post. It looks like fun here, not only because of your own sense of humor, but also because you manage to attract gibbering, mindless, slobbering, bigoted leftists. (Is that redundant?) I will link you at my humble blog so that my 4 or 5 readers will know about you, too.
B.S. Report // August 10, 2009 at 8:08 am |
Tom,
Thanks for the kind words. Welcome aboard, we need all the help we can get. Thanks.
Lucio Mascarenhas // August 17, 2009 at 3:15 am |
If I may ask a question (academic, since I ain’t a U.S. citizen): Why do you think that the “ideas” of the Constitutional Fathers are sacrosanct? Do you believe them “infallible” or some special kind of “oracles of God” instead of ordinary Joes as capable of erring as you and me? And doesn’t that beg the question: What is the proof that all of them were agreed on a common set of ideas?
Allow me to hasten: I believe in Catholic Truth, truth as defined by the infallible Church of God, inspired and animated by the Holy Ghost, and thus far above the intellectual guidance possible with any bunch of ordinary, uninspired men.
B.S. Report // August 17, 2009 at 8:05 am |
Lucio,
Nothing that man constructs is sacrosanct or infallible. But what they managed to do more effectively than any other governmental system was balance the essential needs of government while allowing the people to keep a far greater amount of personal liberty. No they didn’t all agree on every aspect–that doesn’t happen in the real world.
In fact, many of the fears the anti-Federalists had regarding the Constitution have come to fruition. Just read the anti-Federalist papers. Many of their arguments foretold the future. My question to you Lucio is: Do you believe that our present crop of politicians have improved upon the Founders’ wisdom, or have they instead tried to undo many of the safeguards that they implemented?
Do you see a Washington, a Jefferson, a Madison, or an Adams among our current politicos? These men had enormous egos but, nonetheless, they were often able to place the concerns of their country ahead of their own political aspirations. In short, they were statesmen. Sadly, I see very few statesmen today.
My complaint is not that it’s impossible to come up with “meaningful” change to the Constitution–it’s doing it by the means established for by the Constitution. The amendment process allows changes to be made…but using that process is more cumbersome and difficult–it’s easier and more effective to simply disregard that process. And that’s the point, Lucio…Massive change of our system is not supposed to be easy! Thank you so much for your comment.
free *for now* // August 17, 2009 at 5:57 am |
So, you whole-heartedly support the constitution as it was originally written – does that mean then that you feel that slavery should still be legal?
B.S. Report // August 17, 2009 at 9:55 am |
Free “for now”
Slavery was the biggest blight and largest evil in our country’s history–but that doesn’t make your point any more valid. Your statement is simplistic. The Founders’ ideas cannot simply be dismissed because many of them owned slaves. These men were also products of their own times. They couldn’t simply outlaw slavery–even had they wanted to. Their world was not yet ready for that step. Slavery had existed in every society from time immemorial and still exists in some areas even today.
What they managed to do in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was sew the seeds for ending slavery. They new that the ideals they held in these documents were in direct conflict with the institution of slavery. Washington himself feared that a civil war over slavery was a very real possibility.
The Constitution is far from a perfect document and it is easy to find fault with some of its elements. But the amendment process is the mechanism for changing the laws of the land. Instead, politicians have opted to ignore the “rulebook” and repeatedly try to impose their world-view on us citizens without checking with us first. Thanks for your comment.
Lucio Mascarenhas // August 17, 2009 at 9:19 am |
I would like to ask: Are you Catholic?
B.S. Report // August 17, 2009 at 9:35 am |
Lucio,
No, but I happen to live in a “Christian” nation (not officially, of course), and I believe that component is an essential part of the American “character.” You can’t remove the “Christianity” out of the country without irreparably changing the nation. I do adhere to the Judeo-Christian traditions that helped to form this country.
free *for now* // August 19, 2009 at 6:54 am |
I very much enjoyed your response. It was purposefully simplistic. My intent was to solicit an answer as if I had actually posed an open-ended question. I look forward to reading more.
Amanda // August 25, 2009 at 2:35 pm |
B.S.
I just stumbled on this site and you have peaked my interest. I don’t know if I fully agree with you yet as I have not read all of your site. But what I have read sounds like someone who is not repeating something you read or heard someone else say(which is typical in today’s society). Much appreciated.
Marissa // September 6, 2009 at 9:29 am |
Hi, I found your site when I did a search for Bob Hope images (LOVED that man). I totally agree with what you wrote about our military. Bless you for that.
I love this country and am EXTREMELY proud to be an American, though I’m not much politically inclined and I tell people I’m independently Independent. And when I vote either locally or nationally, I’m all over the place Party-wise.
I’d like to come back and revisit your blog. Looks like you have alot of interesting stuff. I see you wrote about the neighbor cannonball incident. When I read that in the papers, I totally cracked up. Doh! Take care and enjoy your mini-break.
dirk // October 9, 2009 at 8:38 pm |
sweet jesus were all going down
Great Title! // October 16, 2009 at 3:16 pm |
……The B.S. Report-
What an excellent title! Being that 99.9 % of what you stand for is….well, B.S.!
*smirk*
B.S. Report // October 16, 2009 at 11:12 pm |
Marcinko,
Very witty Marcinko. I get it–you don’t agree with my principles…and that’s fine. This is America and you’re allowed to have just about any views you wish. I’m not quite clear on why you think the principles of the Founders of this country are B.S. They worked pretty well for 150 years and transformed the U.S. into the greatest nation in world history–that did not happen by accident. It happened because we have a Constitution that limits government power while allowing for greater individual freedom.
Is it just America in general that you dislike? It’s always easy for Liberals, (I assume you’re on the political Left if you disagree with 99.9% of what I believe), who basically have no standards, to make fun of those who do. It enables you to get off the hook by simply answering: “I don’t believe in anything so you can’t hold me to anything.” But Liberalism’s basic premise is immoral. It can be summed up by the following statement: “We will use the power of government to take away the private property of those who lawfully produced it and give it to those whom it does not belong.” Why does that strike you as more noble? Thanks Marcinko for your comment–and even your *smirk.*
marcinko // October 17, 2009 at 12:46 pm |
I was neither born nor raised in America…I see no reason why I should endeavor to be more American, or pro-American, for that matter
I suppose by American standards, I’m left-wing.
So be it
B.S. Report // October 17, 2009 at 1:42 pm |
Marcinko,
I’m not questioning your right to dislike America–though it’s particularly crass of individuals who willingly come here to do so. However, I do wonder why you would willingly choose to be less free? Also, there is an inherent obligation for those who choose to live here to assimilate–and not for you to bring the failed ways and policies of the country you left behind.
The fact that you see no reason to be more American, or even pro-America! is an example of your own selfishness and one of the reasons why America is starting to look like failed Europe. Regards.
marcinko // October 17, 2009 at 2:01 pm |
” However, I do wonder why you would willingly choose to be less free? Also, there is an inherent obligation for those who choose to live here to assimilate–and not for you to bring the failed ways and policies of the country you left behind. The fact that you see no reason to be more American, or even pro-America! is an example of your own selfishness and one of the reasons why America is starting to look like failed Europe. ”
LOL …I see
marcinko // October 17, 2009 at 2:11 pm |
” I completely agree with you. We need to arm ourselves and kill off all of those who threaten our way of life, from the gays to obama to the socialists at the post office. ”
Careful what you wish for, Dick…there’s always room for more in the gas chamber…..
B.S. Report // October 17, 2009 at 3:05 pm |
Marcinko,
Typical non sequitur by someone too intellectually ill-equipped to debate the issues responsibly. You make up your own quotes and then you debate them as if they are mine. You obviously don’t need me around to spoil your personal debate–and I don’t need to expend any more effort on you. I tried, but you’re not worth the time. Marcinko, take it easy.
marcinko // October 17, 2009 at 3:08 pm |
” We need to arm ourselves and kill off all of those who threaten our way of life ”
That quote came from Jew-boy (ol’ Dicky Goldberg)- just hoping to rattle his cage
T Christopher // October 21, 2009 at 1:43 pm |
Just came across your site for the first time. Very well done. I am going to add a link to my site to remind myself to venture back here from time to time. Its refreshing to find a site that isn’t so caught up in traditional party politics that it can’t see the real issues standing in its face.
B.S. Report // October 21, 2009 at 1:56 pm |
T Christopher,
Thanks for the kind words. All the best to you–and keep up the fight.
conservativethinkers // October 27, 2009 at 10:28 am |
Wondeful Blog! Mine is also here on WordPress and I’d like to add yours to my links area so people can see the great work you are doing here. Judging by the angry comments from liberals, you are obviously striking a nerve. Thank you and keep it up.
Randy at http://conservativethinkers.wordpress.com/
B.S. Report // October 27, 2009 at 10:31 am |
Randy,
Thanks for the kind words and keep fighting the good fight!
conservativethinkers // October 27, 2009 at 10:50 am |
You too. I added your page to my links area. Good luck.
George // November 22, 2009 at 9:27 pm |
I agree with the principles in “Where We Stand.” What I can’t understand is some of the weird comments you attract. Your site principles should be a rallying point for those of us who are a more than a bit desperate to save an America that appears all but lost.
B.S. Report // November 22, 2009 at 9:59 pm |
Thanks George,
I didn’t think for a moment that I was writing anything radical. I was just attempting to put into everyday language what I think the Founders basic ideals are. After all, they had a far better grasp of the dangers of an all-powerful government than we have today. It’s discouraging to think that a large percentage of our population may actually be against these principles.
We tend to think that we’re so much smarter today simply because those guys lived 250 years ago. But lets be honest: Where are the Franklins, Jeffersons, Madisons, Washingtons or Hamiltons of today? In fact, where are the statesmen and women who are willing to put country ahead of their own personal ambitions? I see very few in either party. That’s why the Constitution and the idea of limited government is so important. Because, to put it mildly, government is made up of human beings with all our failings. For that reason, it cannot be trusted. George, thanks for your comment and your kind words. Keep up the good fight!
The Child who had no Childhood. // November 23, 2009 at 1:48 pm |
nice to see that you erased a perfectly good post. For the record, when I posted it, I did check to make sure that it had been posted.
Clearly you didn’t bother to read the entire thing. There was a liberal bash midway.
And a well detailed one at that, which now, you shant be reading unless you saved it… but I surmise that you didn’t.
Thanks a lot for that. At least you couldn’t bash on it.
Just remember it, and remember that you deleted it, and recall the effort that went into it.
Was it too long? Perhaps. But worth reading?
I think so.
…also thanks. I’d forgotten why I didn’t post on these sites. The bias level is over 9000, especially if you weren’t willing to read far enough to make it to the part you liked.
Have a nice day.
B.S. Report // November 23, 2009 at 4:36 pm |
The Child,
I considered posting your comment for a little while but ultimately decided not to because I felt it wasn’t cohesive enough. I’m more than happy to post what you have to say, regardless of your content–but it has to be coherent so we can follow your arguments. I don’t care one iota whether you bash conservatives or liberals–but if you’re going to write a treatise you have to make it more concise.
Was it too long–yes, it was too long, but only because it wasn’t tight enough. Listen, I’m not attacking your writing skill, your views, or you personally–I just had a few problems with the organization of this particular post. In fact, I think you had many good points to make–and yes, I did read it all. But finally I decided that instead of reducing it and then have you criticize me for editing your work–I wouldn’t post it. By the way, I still have it saved because I figured you might respond to the fact that I didn’t publish it.
I appreciate and understand the amount of time, effort, and yes, thought that goes into writing a comment–especially one of that length. No hard feelings are meant and I am happy to publish this comment as well as your future comments. Thanks again for taking the time out of your day to contribute. I really do appreciate it. All the best.
The Child who had no Childhood. // November 30, 2009 at 11:01 am |
Well, well.
I must admit… I’m actually impressed.
On a whim, I decided I might as well check up on this place again, and to be honest… I didn’t expect to have a response.
I’ve come to expect the “instant dismissal” treatement from a lot of these sites after I post.
Unfortunately, there are often relatively repetitive reasons for which posts are removed, or simply not put up.
But that there was any acknowledgment at all that the post existed, at least reveals that this may not be the case here.
Several sites before this, many of which held a clear and concise bias, (I’ve seen both ends of that spectrum… and it isn’t a pretty sight) immediately jettisoned such posts… but much to my amazement, you have done as I would do.
You saved the post.
This was perhaps the last thing I expected… but what it reveals is that you are indeed, as your claim might suggest, considerably more open to debate than many others, so to speak.
It also reveals, that you do not dismiss posts as the previous places did, just based on the content of its information.
Many sites, have claimed similar political “aura’s” so-to-speak, but this is now one of few that has, at the very least, the merit of trying (heck, I’d like to give you a medal, but that’s beyond my ability I’m afraid)
…I believe I shall be coming here more often after all.
About the post…
(Yes, it was too long) xD True enough.
(…disorganized…) Yes, yes it was. I suppose that’s what 4 hours of typing does to a person. It perhaps gets harder to regulate the repetition of points within the structure of an essay-like post as time passes.
The disorganization is likely due to my lack of energy upon reviewing, and ending my post. I would apologize… but hey, for finishing at 1:00 in the morning, I think did pretty good.
My apologies for the slight agitation I exhibited after the post disappeared. I too, saved it. However, it has become relatively rare for such sites to… listen at all. Especially given the nature of partisan-style politics that are likely happening elsewhere at this very moment.
I think I’ll stop by this site every so often,
for your actions exhibit traits which I believe worthy of a certain level of respect.
Kudos to you.
B.S. Report // December 1, 2009 at 5:19 pm |
The Child,
Thanks for the kind words. As much as I’d like to accept the medal you’re offering, alas, I don’t deserve it. I believe I have an obligation to publish coherent views regardless of whether they conflict with my own. As for your original post, I really did feel bad for not publishing it, but I explained my reasons behind that. I look forward to reading your opinions in the future. Thanks again.
B.S. Report // August 14, 2009 at 7:42 pm |
Cherry,
You’re very articulate…thanks for the comment.