Romance At The Workplace–Don’t, It’s A Bad Idea!
On many nights over 16 years, Kenneth Douglas engaged in his own personal macabre workplace party.
He often brought drugs or alcohol to work and sometimes had sex with women.
At least three of those women were dead, Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said Thursday.
But if Douglas is to be believed, he could have had sex with as many as “over a hundred” bodies in the 16 years he worked as night attendant at the Hamilton County morgue.
“I am sure there are more (victims). I’m certain of it,” Deters said Thursday in announcing new indictments against Douglas.
“This guy’s just a pig. I can’t explain why someone would do something like this. … This is off-the-charts weird.”
Peter Bronson: Sick, sick, sick and dead wrong
Douglas, 55, of Westwood, already is serving a prison sentence after he pleaded guilty last year to abuse of a corpse. He admitted he had sex with the nearly beheaded body of 19-year-old murder victim Karen Range in 1982.
Thursday, Douglas was indicted on two more counts of abuse of a corpse after DNA evidence, Deters said, showed Douglas’ semen was in the bodies of two women who were killed in 1991 and stored at the morgue awaiting autopsies:
Charlene Edwards, also known as Charlene Apling, who was six months pregnant.
She was strangled to death Oct. 1, 1991, by Mark Chambers, now 47, in Chambers’ Avondale home. Chambers originally was charged with murder but accepted a plea bargain and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and sent to prison for 10-25 years. He was paroled in 2000. (Read more.)
B.S. Report–I’ve sometimes wondered what kind of person would want to work at a morgue. And I usually came to the conclusion that it was exactly the kind depicted in this story. A sick, nerdy, lonely loser–not that there’s anything wrong with that…until you start doing the stuff he did…
I guess morgues don’t have the strictest hiring standards. But, ironically, this guy can serve as little as 3 years. But I just think they’ll come up with more charges though, like tampering with evidence. This guy is going away for a long time.
I can hear his attorney’s argument clearly: “My client, although his behavior was somewhat “unusual” did not harm anyone. Furthermore, none of his victims ever once voiced an objection to his actions! You’ve heard that ‘No means No’…Never once did any woman utter a ‘No’ or a ‘Stop’ or anything that would indicate displeasure.”
“Furthermore your Honor, just from a results standpoint it must be said that my client is only being accused of misdeeds with 29 corpses…your Honor, thousands of bodies came through the morgue during Mr. Douglas’ work tenure–that means that well over 90% of the time he acted entirely properly. That’s a marvelously high success rate! Thank you your Honor, The Defense Rests.”
This is kind of what was going on…but in reverse. (Semi-graphic.)






