Ohio woman pleads guilty in over-exercising death
CHARDON, Ohio (AP) — A woman has pleaded guilty to reckless homicide for exercising her 73-year-old husband to death in a swimming pool, repeatedly refusing to let him leave the water.

"Christine Newton John" ...ugly in any gender.
Surveillance video showed Christine Newton-John, 41, pulling James Mason around the pool by his arms and legs, said Middlefield police Chief Joseph Stehlik
The chief said he counted 43 times in which Newton-John prevented her husband from leaving the water, and Mason rested his head on the side of the pool several times while gasping for breath.
“The video is bone-chilling,” Stehlik said. “The whole case is very sinister.”
Mason had a heart attack on June 2 after the extended swim session. An officer who had investigated previous complaints that Mason was being abused pursued the case because he suspected there was more to the death, Stehlik said.
Newton-John pleaded guilty Thursday and faces up to five years in prison. No sentencing date was set.
Police did not immediately respond to a call Saturday seeking comment on a motive.
The video would have had a profound effect on a jury, Geauga County Prosecutor David Joyce said. But that wouldn’t have been enough for a conviction if Newton-John had been charged with murder.
“You can see the man struggling for his life on the tape, but there is no audio, so we couldn’t hear what he was saying,” he said.
Geauga County Chief Public Defender Robert Umholtz, who represented Newton-John, declined to comment.
Mason was a longtime friend of his wife’s family. He knew her as John Vallandingham before she had gender reassignment surgery in 1993 and changed her name in honor of the singer and star of the hit movie version of the musical “Grease.”
The couple were wed in 2006 in Kentucky, where people can change their gender on their birth certificate.
B.S. Report–This AP story clearly shows the wire service’s politically correct bias. When I came upon this story, every article and TV story– except the AP version, quickly mentioned the fact that the “so-called” woman was a “transgender” woman.
The AP story, however, was different. Their headline and their lead describe the defendant as an “Ohio woman.” I don’t care what your personal views are regarding sex-changes, but shouldn’t “she” be described as an Ohio “transgender woman” immediately in the story?”
It’s not until the 2nd to last paragraph of this story that the AP “gently” reveals the totally unrelated fact (in their view), that Mrs. Newton-John just happens to be a transgender woman who had sex-change surgery in 1993 and took the name Newton-John because she admired the well known singer/actress Olivia Newton-John from the Grease films.
The AP mentions the sex-change only in passing; they choose to gloss over this “woman’s” past as if they know it has nothing to do with the present crime for which she has plead guilty. The AP doesn’t want to be accused of intolerance, or even worse, of actually believing that an individual that pursues this drastic course in their life might be slightly, or even seriously, disturbed.
I’ll go out on a limb and say that any person who has sex-change surgery is “ipso-facto” disturbed. It might be necessary if that person cannot function otherwise, but don’t tell me that the person isn’t mentally disturbed.
Aside from being deeply troubled, I don’t know what kind of man John Vallandingham was before he became “Christine Newton-John.” But, by looks alone, Newton-John is not “convincing” as a woman. That can only lead to unhappiness. And in this case, it probably led to disaster.
Christine Newton-John has plead guilty to a lesser charge of reckless homicide instead of murder and will be lucky to serve a maximum of just 5 years. She may not have been an evil man…but she has shown herself to be an evil “woman.”







