Obama Wants Big Government…Duh
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A public furor over big bonuses paid by firms bailed out with U.S. taxpayer money is fueling resistance to President Barack Obama’s ambitious plans to extend government intervention in the U.S. private sector.
Republican opponents say his commitment of huge sums to try to revive the ailing economy is driven by a philosophical belief in greater government intrusion in many areas, from healthcare to education, dubbing it socialism.
B.S.–“Dubbing it socialism?” Socialism has an actual definition: State ownership of industry, capital, and the means of production. Isn’t this exactly what Obama has been doing?
![obama_socialism1 obama_socialism1](https://thebsreport.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_socialism1.jpg?w=500)
Obama is pursuing these policies just 13 years after President Bill Clinton, a fellow Democrat, disarmed Republican opponents by declaring: “The era of big government is over.”
As the enormous cost of the Obama’s effort to stimulate the economy grows, many are weighing just how far government should be extending its powers.
“We’re in the midst of a huge political battle, which is being obscured behind a financial crisis,” said Bruce Kogut, professor of ethics and corporate governance at Columbia University. “If the financial crisis wasn’t here we’d be having this battle anyway.”
“The question I think we need to figure out as a country is what is the proper role of government?” said David Moss, professor of economic history at Harvard Business School.
B.S.–This is absolutely unbelievable! The question is what is the proper role of government? No, that’s not the question…because, for us here in America, that question was answered with the ratification of the Constitution back in 1789.
We know, to a large extent, what our Founders and Framers wanted the role of government to be. It’s politicians that don’t want to follow the rule of law and abide by the Constitution, because it’s the Constitution that enumerates their powers and limits their authority.
Regulation of the financial system to contain risk has not been adequate or effective, he said. “So on the financial front we want to try to find a Goldilocks scenario of not too much and not too little.”
Obama administration officials have had to fend off accusations they were too easy on the financial industry, after the insurance giant AIG paid out millions of dollars in bonuses after accepting billions of dollars in taxpayer funds. (Read more.)
B.S. Report–Notice how this story is written with a kind, kid-gloves treatment of Socialism, as if it’s not inferior to capitalism–but merely just different. Forget about all the hundreds of millions of people murdered by Socialism, or those whose lives were destroyed.
Yes, in the U.S. we just “happen” to believe in individual rights and personal freedom (or we used to), while many of you guys in Europe or anywhere else just “happen” to believe that the most important decisions in your life should be made by a large, national, controlling State. It’s not a question of “better” or “worse” …but it’s just “different.” And vive la difference!
The fact that we’re lapsing into Socialism is a product of apathy and ignorance on the part of us citizens. Ignorance of our Constitution and what it means, and how it has protected us from charismatic demagogues in the past.
Add to that the misunderstanding of capitalism and how it’s capitalism that is precisely responsible for our ever-increasing standard of living. Yet we demonize capitalism and the profit motive as if it’s something we should be ashamed of–instead of proud.
No system is perfect; there is no utopia here on Earth. But look around the world and ask yourself which countries are responsible for feeding the world’s hungry and clothing the world’s poor?
If you said those that rely on capitalism go to the head of the class. And it’s to our credit if we still believe that Socialism is a dirty word here.